Start with the decisive weaknesses
Read the critiques alongside the application to identify the concerns that materially affect credibility. Separate issues of presentation from gaps in evidence, scientific premise, feasibility, or opportunity fit.
Menu
Services
Decide what to do after the summary statement
Interpret reviewer feedback, distinguish fixable weaknesses from strategic problems, and decide whether to resubmit, redirect, or stop.
Assess resubmission feasibility
- What additional evidence or changes would address the central concerns?
- Can the necessary work be completed within the company’s resources and timeline?
- Does the original opportunity still fit, or should the project be redirected?
- Which response priorities should guide a revision, and what should be discussed with the program officer?
What you receive
A summary-statement interpretation, prioritized response and evidence needs, and a go / redirect / stop recommendation. When resubmission is justified, the output is a focused strategy for the next application.
How the engagement works
Share the submitted application, summary statement, relevant program-officer feedback, and your current constraints. We review the materials, assess alternatives, and discuss the recommended path and revision priorities.
Scope
The service supports a strategic decision and response priorities. It does not include full application rewriting or guarantee a better score or award.
Related guide: After the Summary Statement: Resubmit, Redirect, or Stop
Explore NIH SBIR/STTR strategy or other services.
Your next funding decision
Discuss your funding strategy
Tell us what your company is pursuing, where you are in the process, and what decision or review you need help with.
Discuss your funding strategy